“I’m an Astrologer”: The Complexity of Naming What We Do

Today while notarizing some papers--there with my husband and father-in-law-- the chatty and sweet notary asked what I did for a living. “I’m an astrologer,” I answered with a bit too much emphasis, knowing how such occupations are received at small, boutique banks in the heart of academia. My father-in-law, an otherwise intelligent and generous man, promptly laughed apologetically — a laugh which I read as “ridiculous, isn’t it?” This once again sent me into a tailspin of silent frustration and the lifelong desire to be able to answer “accountant”- or something similarly innocuous-- whenever asked for my occupation.

I wish it was as simple as saying that I have a father-in-law who doesn’t get what I do. That’s certainly unfortunate, but definitely not the whole picture. If I’m honest, I am uncomfortable owning the title myself and so I project my own discomfort onto anyone who resists it in the world outside.

So, why would I quietly reject what I say I do?

Early in my career, I had doubts about my work. I prepared for hours before I did a chart. Was I good enough? Did my readings have impact? Today, I’m excited and curious before a reading. I know I’m good at what I do. And I know I make a difference in people’s lives. And I actually LOVE being in the room with a client and finding the keys that unlock the magic of the chart.

So, it’s not doubt in my ability that makes me uncomfortable saying I’m an astrologer. There are two reasons that make sense to me.   The first is more obvious: I’m embarrassed that I’m part of a profession that so many people look at with derision. Simply put, there’s a part of me that wants to belong, that wants it simple, that wants to climb a traditional ladder. Obviously, this is not the path I’m carving out in this lifetime, but I have to admit that in the quiet corners of my being, I feel the part that wants it simpler, less complicated--the part that doesn’t want to be speaking a different language in a place where few know the words.

The second reason is more subtle. It has to do with the frustration of the title ‘astrologer’ not really fitting the WHOLE of what I do. (Do we all feel this way?) That is, I’m charting territory that is new (or so it feels) and I’m using many different tools. One of the tools is astrology. But I am also profoundly interested in how we all can learn to love another or see one another as love. I’m interested in embodiment and the power of living something fully in the body. I’m interested in writing and reading poetry and offering it as a gift of self-revelation.

In the last few years, I have named what I do “Liberating love through Astrology and the Expressive Arts.” Of course that isn’t a job title but it comes closer to capturing my quest. Whenever we talk about unfolding our capacity to love more deeply, it’s not something easily named.

But I want a name! I want a name that allows me to breathe deeply as I say it. I want to offer what I do as a blessing and perhaps a curiosity but with full commitment. I want my whole body to radiantly say “YES! I get to answer this question! I get to tell you what I do.”

Oh friends, it’s strange. My work requires that I’m comfortable off the beaten track, and yet, to be honest, I’m not a totally road-less-traveled person.  My work requires that I have a deep inner silence unruffled by the expectation or reaction of others.  And in truth I have worked many years to learn to uncover and maintain that silence.  Doesn’t all our deepest work require that?

One of my mother-in-law’s favorite stories about my husband is that when he was a little boy, he was building a sandcastle at the beach with great joy and intensity. At some point, his sister came over and surprised him by dumping a huge bucket of water on his head. His only reaction was to wipe the water from his eyes, shake his head and continue his project.

May we all be so unruffled as we pursue what we most love.

And may the ongoing search for our true work identity be a seamless part of gracefully unfolding who we truly are.

******

**Friend Friday will return next week.

Bookmark and Share
7 Responses to “I’m an Astrologer”: The Complexity of Naming What We Do
  1. Madley
    August 27, 2010 | 1:51 am

    HELLO LOVE!

    Thank you, beautiful Heidi, for a wonderful — and timely — post. I was driving to The Big D and trying to figure out when I could buy your CD series (of course I want the whole thing!), and how I could share this info (and YOU) with my friends.

    And didn’t want to say “This is Heidi, my astrologer” because you’re so, so much more to me — and a thousand times more than simply the title of “what you do to support yourself”…

    A lush and rich wife/mother/daughter/friend, a director, an actress, a speaker, an astrologer, a writer, a poet, an artist, a seminar facilitator, a motivational speaker, a movement guru, an embodiment of peace/success, a gatherer of minds, an embracer of souls, and an unlocker of pain/love… just to name a few. I’ve seen you bloom over the years in so many different areas (your first website, first talks, first house, first son) and… when I grow up, I want to be Heidi Rose! Okay, I want to be ME but with the FULLNESS OF LIFE that is YOU.

    I want to say, “So who cares, so what?!” (Thank you CABARET.) What does it matter the title is? Nobody cares but the IRS, and you can tell ‘em anything you want.” But I know YOU care, and I don’t want to discount extremely valid your feelings. I’ll just finish with these two things:

    (1) What does David Deida call himself — to himself and to those he helps and heals? Or anyone else you completely admire? Look UP :)

    (2) In my VERY humble opinion, the way it’s going in the world — we will ALL soon be hyphenates and have as gorgeous a title as yours! And people who only have single work titles will almost have to include their entire being as well to not seem — ONE DIMENSIONAL (“Hi, I’m Dr. Miller: Obstetrician-Composer-Shotputter-Buddhist”). None of us are one-dimensional anymore! (See, Fellow Aries? You’re leading the way :)

    Truly, Heidi, when I think of you — you are the embodiment of LOVE. Love for self, for others, for the world. However I know saying, “I’m a LOVER” kinda doesn’t capture the whole thing (hehehe) — but that’s just for now.

    (Maybe someday we won’t need titles at all, IRS be damned.)

    Lavishing you with love always,
    Madley

  2. heidirose
    August 27, 2010 | 8:41 am

    Madley,
    THis is a gorgeous response. I want to pour it over me. And breathe it in. And soak in it.
    Thank you love.
    I can feel the Jupiter in your life right now—-Has it hit your sun?
    Love love to you dear friend.

  3. Mary
    August 27, 2010 | 11:05 am

    My reading with you continues to turn in my mind. I am grateful for, and fascinated by, the work that you do, and I cannot wait to sit with you again. I will be better because of the time we spend together. Thank you for this gift.

  4. kristie
    August 28, 2010 | 3:52 am

    Heidi thanks for sharing this I second all previous comments. Thank goodness your not an accountant as i cannot imagine a world without your gifts. Among many qualities that i LOVE and admire about you i would have to say the one that is most inspiring to me is the fact that you know what your gifts are and you share them with the world. You share them hugely and fearlessly in the face of all that you just shared above. You are a tremendous source of light and breath and love.
    What you do lives in a different space, a mythopoetic space and without this space in the world we would all shrivel up and die!!!! In fact many hearts and souls are already shriveld up and dead and in need of someone with your gifts to pour a little elixer over them!
    You are a feeder of the soul and a nourisher of hearts. What you do breaks up the old paradigm of what is possible on all levels. You have found your daimon as the greeks would say and are blazing a path for the rest of us. I don’t doubt that it is hard and lonely and scary and frustrating at times. But thank God you do it. Thank God you didn’t take the safe road and find a nice safe career with a good title, then tuck away all your beauty and poetry and love. There are plenty of people doing that, we don’t need anymore of those. I guess you just have to doubt your doubts sometimes.
    xo, Kristie

  5. (http://www NULL.mapofthehand NULL.com)Meredyth (http://www NULL.mapofthehand NULL.com)
    August 29, 2010 | 7:38 pm

    I would love for you to say you are an accountant just once cause I think it would make you laugh soooo hard that the next time you said you are an astrologer you would say it with a huge smile remembering your time as an accountant!

    Huge love to you my favorite astrologer!

  6. Catherine
    August 30, 2010 | 6:01 pm

    Once in Sofia’s class something like this came up. So Sofia had us all name what we did – with the understanding that the name of what we “do” was like the clark kent to our superman. Not meant to sum up our every marvelousness – maybe even a bit of a cloak that allows us to do some good work. It was so liberating to name what I do (then – Rolfer) and let it not be all of me, or even most of me. I was able to own the label more, without squirming because of all the ways it wasn’t quite right. God bless Sofia!

  7. biren
    December 31, 2011 | 10:16 am

    heidi dear,
    we don’t know each other – i know OF you (since only a couple of days), you don’t even know of me.
    :)
    but from whatever i have known OF you, here… you are NOT an astrologer.
    astrology is what you DO – and do gorgeously and with deep love – it’s not who you are…

    your work, and words seem to make me feel… you are like the sculptor… who is chipping away the un-necessary dross… to unearth and reveal the soul – the sculpture.

    you may, or maynot be a sculptor… who ‘reveals and releases’ soul and soulfulness…

    but hopefully, this adds up to the love that will help you ‘chip away’ the dross that hides your ‘name’ from yourself.

    warm and gentle heart-squeezes.

Leave a Reply

Trackback URL http://heidirose.com/archives/1592/trackback